Paid Media
Microsoft Ads vs Google Ads for financial services: which is better?
Last reviewed 22 April 2026 · Reviewed by Jake McQuillan
Quick answer
Microsoft Ads vs Google Ads for financial services: which is better?
Google wins on volume and coverage; Microsoft wins on CPC efficiency, older-demographic reach and less-crowded auctions. Most mature UK advisers run both, with Microsoft taking 10-20% of paid-search budget.
Want us to do this for your firm?
Get a compliant lead-gen plan tailored to your niche and compliance setup.
Microsoft Ads vs Google Ads for UK Financial Services
Google Ads dominates UK search, with roughly 92% market share. It is where you go for volume, breadth of keyword coverage and the deepest audience signals.
Microsoft Ads covers Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, Edge and Outlook - roughly 7-8% of UK search. Its users skew:
- Older (55% over 35, vs 48% on Google)
- Higher household income (Bing skews AB/C1)
- More desktop-heavy (Edge and Office defaults)
For regulated financial firms this means Microsoft is often more efficient per lead on pension consolidation, IHT planning, equity release and retirement annuities - the exact niches where buyer age correlates with AUM.
Was this useful?
Related questions
What is the cheapest paid-search channel for UK financial advice?
Microsoft Ads is typically the cheapest paid search channel in UK financial services, with CPCs 20 28% below Google for equivalent keywords, though volume is c…
Does Microsoft Ads work for UK financial advisers?
Yes. Microsoft Ads typically delivers 20 28% lower CPC than Google for the same advisory keywords, with an older, higher net worth UK audience that suits pensi…