Head-to-head

Adviser Marketing Comparisons

Meta vs Google, LinkedIn vs Meta, Plannr vs Intelliflo. Objective comparisons built for UK adviser firms choosing channels, tools and tactics.

Quick answer

What do the Platinum Prospects comparison pages cover?

Each comparison page evaluates two options (channel, platform, tactic or tool) against 4-6 criteria relevant to UK advisers: cost, speed to lead, compliance fit, scalability and audience quality. Every comparison ends with a clear verdict.

Financial Adviser Tools

CashCalc vs Voyant for Lead Generation

CashCalc is faster to deploy for lead-gen landing pages; Voyant offers deeper modelling for later consultations. Most firms use CashCalc for marketing and Voyant for advice.

Read comparison
Financial Advisers

Google Business Profile vs Bing Places for Financial Advisers

Google Business Profile is non-negotiable; Bing Places is a low-effort optional layer. Prioritise GBP and only add Bing once GBP is fully optimised.

Read comparison
Financial Advisers

Google Search vs Performance Max for Financial Advisers

Use Search for compliance transparency and clean attribution; use Performance Max sparingly and only with robust offline conversions and creative guardrails.

Read comparison
Financial Adviser CRM

Intelliflo vs Plannr CRM for Financial Advisers

Intelliflo dominates network-backed advisers; Plannr suits modern chartered planners with better UX. Pick based on back-office integration and adviser workflow.

Read comparison
Wealth Managers

LinkedIn vs Meta for Wealth Managers

LinkedIn delivers higher-quality HNW leads at 180-420 pounds CPL; Meta delivers 3-5x volume at 90-200 pounds. Scaled wealth firms run both, with 25-35% of budget on LinkedIn for high-AUM outcomes.

Read comparison
Adviser Tracking Stack

Meta CAPI vs Google OCI for Offline Conversion Tracking

Both are essential - Meta CAPI for Meta ads, Google OCI (Offline Conversion Import) for Google Ads. Implement both; they are not alternatives.

Read comparison
UK Regulated Finance

Meta Instant Forms vs Landing Pages for Financial Services

Landing pages win downstream: lower CPL on instant forms is offset by 2-3x lower lead quality. For UK regulated finance, a landing page with compliance block outperforms almost always.

Read comparison
Independent Financial Advisers

Meta vs Google Ads for IFA Leads

Meta drives volume and lower CPL for mass-affluent IFA enquiries; Google Search drives higher-intent leads at 1.8-2.6x CPL. Most scaled IFAs run both, tilting toward Google for HNW.

Read comparison
paid-search

Microsoft Ads vs Google Ads for UK Financial Services

Which paid-search platform delivers better ROI for regulated UK advisory firms? A side-by-side benchmark comparison.

Read comparison
paid-search-and-b2b

Microsoft Ads vs LinkedIn Ads for UK B2B Financial Services

Can Microsoft Audience Network reach the same professional audiences as LinkedIn Ads at a lower cost?

Read comparison
Financial Advisers

Referrals vs Paid Media for Financial Advisers

Referrals are the highest-LTV, lowest-cost channel but do not scale linearly; paid media scales predictably but carries higher CAC. Mature firms run both.

Read comparison
Financial Advisers

Trustpilot vs VouchedFor for Financial Advisers

VouchedFor is the UK-adviser-specific choice with The Times Guide ecosystem; Trustpilot is broader but less adviser-targeted. Most firms run both.

Read comparison
Adviser Content Marketing

Webinars vs Podcasts for Financial Adviser Marketing

Webinars convert better short-term; podcasts build compounding brand and authority. Run webinars for pipeline, podcasts for owned audience over 12+ months.

Read comparison
Adviser Proposition

Whole of Market vs Restricted Adviser Proposition

Whole-of-market is a stronger marketing position for most UK consumer advice; restricted can win on specialisation and simplicity. The marketing narrative differs sharply.

Read comparison