Skip to main content
Channels

Should a financial adviser use Google Ads or Meta ads?

Last reviewed 22 April 2026 · Reviewed by Jake McQuillan

Quick answer

Should a financial adviser use Google Ads or Meta ads?

Use Google Search for high-intent, bottom-of-funnel queries (pension transfer, equity release, IFA near me). Use Meta for prospecting, retargeting and nurture to older demographics who have the need but are not yet searching.

Want us to do this for your firm?
Get a compliant lead-gen plan tailored to your niche and compliance setup.
Book a discovery call

TL;DR

Google captures demand, Meta creates it. Most successful UK adviser firms run both.

  • Captures high-intent searches (pension transfer, equity release specialist, IFA near me).
  • Conversion rates 5 to 12% on well-built landing pages.
  • CPC £3 to £22 depending on niche and geography.

Meta (Facebook / Instagram) strengths

  • Best-in-class demographic and interest targeting for 45+ audiences.
  • Lower CPL on lead-form objectives (£25 to £85 typical).
  • Excellent for retargeting warm traffic off Google.
  • Google Search: 50 to 70% of budget for demand capture.
  • Meta: 25 to 40% for prospecting and retargeting.
  • LinkedIn: 10 to 20% if targeting HNW or professional audiences.

Rule

Start with Google for any niche where people actively search ("pension transfer advice"), layer Meta once you have a warm retargeting pool.

Was this useful?
JM
Reviewed by
Jake McQuillan
Founder at Platinum Prospects
Last reviewed 22 April 2026

Ask your own question

Describe your firm’s situation and we’ll reply with a tailored answer and benchmarks.

We’ll email you once with an answer. No marketing sequences.