Channels
Should a financial adviser use Meta or Google for lead generation?
Last reviewed 22 April 2026 · Reviewed by Jake McQuillan
Quick answer
Should a financial adviser use Meta or Google for lead generation?
Use Google for high-intent, lower-volume leads (pension transfer, IFA enquiry) and Meta for broader-reach, lower-CPL niches (equity release, mortgage, protection).
Want us to do this for your firm?
Get a compliant lead-gen plan tailored to your niche and compliance setup.
Decision framework
Google Search wins when:
- Query intent is strong ("DB pension transfer advice")
- Average deal value exceeds 2,000 pounds
- You can absorb 200-400 pounds CPL
Meta wins when:
- Creative angle is strong (equity release, protection)
- You need volume and can nurture
- CPL needs to stay under 120 pounds
Reality
Most scaled UK advisers run both, with 60-70% budget on the channel that matches their best converting deal type.
Was this useful?
Related questions
How should I structure a Google Ads account for a financial adviser?
One campaign per service (pension, mortgage, protection), one ad group per intent cluster, 10 20 keywords per group, phrase + exact match only, negative list s…
What is a lookalike audience in financial advice marketing?
A lookalike audience is a Meta/Google audience built from your existing clients, used to target new prospects who share similar characteristics, typically prod…
Should financial advisers use WhatsApp for lead follow-up?
Yes, for confirmation and light nurture but WhatsApp Business with consent, PECR compliance, and full record retention. Avoid personal numbers.
What is the best platform to get financial adviser leads in the UK?
For most UK IFAs, Meta delivers the lowest CPL at scale while Google Search delivers the highest intent leads; LinkedIn is strongest for HNW and corporate advi…
Should I use exact match or phrase match in financial Google Ads?
Start phrase + exact, review search terms weekly, and let long tail queries graduate to their own exact match ad groups. Broad match only with strong negatives…